Say NO to the CPSIA!
This is a post about a topic that affects many of us in the handmade and Indie community that I felt needed to be shared! It was recently brought to my attention by Connie at Sweet Figments, this was her post and image from her blog this past Monday please take a look:
I am writing this as blogger of handmade and vintage items, as well as, a small business owner. I would like to inform you of a new legislation called the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) that was recently passed by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in August of 2008. This new law was created with the intention to protect children under the age of 12 from coming in contact with lead and other harmful substances that can be found in toys, furniture and clothing. I think it’s really great that the CPSC is being so active in this battle to protect young children but when this law goes into effect on February 10th, 2009 thousands of small and medium size manufactures and retailers Internationally will be forced to shut their doors (or at least shut their doors to the US).
According to this new law, every manufacture and retailer (regardless of whether they are a sole proprietor working from home or a multi-million dollar corporation) importing into, exporting out of or within the United States needs to have their products tested to comply with this law. Testing would be to ensure substances such as lead and phthalates are not found in toys, furniture or clothing used by any child aged 12 and under. Any manufacture or retailer who does not comply with these laws are at risk of being charged with a felony which could involve thousands of dollars in fines for each violation as well as jail time.
From what I understand, manufactures (if you make the end product you are a manufacture) will have to gain certification by having their items tested at a CPSC approved lab. These tests are devastating to a small business owner. As an example, the estimated cost for a test could be around $500 per test. To show you how much of an impact this is on a small business owner or at home crafter here is an example:
If I want to make a jacket for a 5 year old to sell in my Etsy shop I would have to have each of the following tested: exterior fabric, lining, thread, snap buttons, and zipper. That’s 5 x $500 per test = $2,500 for one jacket. Now, if I want to make 10 similar jackets in different fabrics or different colors those need to be tested separately too so now you’re at $25,000 for 10 jackets. Wait, it gets even better! If at any time I run out of these materials, decide to alter the jacket by adding a hood, or change the lining fabric I will have to have the entire piece retested to comply with this law. It is simply not economical for a company small or large to run these tests.
In addition to the mandatory testing, this new law also states that anything that was manufactured before February 10th, 2009 and has not been tested to meet CPSC standards cannot be sold. This means after February 10th, 2009 it would be illegal for you to have a yard sale or donate your old clothes to be resold at a local thrift shop. I also want to bring to your attention that since retailers cannot sell pre-existing inventory that has not been tested, perfectly good items which would have otherwise been sold will become worthless and probably end up in your local landfills. Also, because of the costs incurred by all of these tests the prices of children’s items would increase exponentially. Schools will take the biggest hit as basic school supplies such as science equipment, books, furniture, writing utensils, etc… would need to be tested in order to be sold to a school and because of all the small businesses closing up there will be fewer donations made to many needy charities.
Another issue with this law is that there is no clear definition of what is intended or not intended to be used by a child aged 12 and under. If you look around you there are so many kids these days under 12 years old that run around with cellphones, purses, wearing make up, buying adult size clothing and retailers advertising to that specific market. (Example: Family phone plan) How can this law be regulated if there is no clear definition? and why does it only apply to items for children age 12 and under? Do you magically become immune to lead poisoning after your 13th birthday? The CPSA has said that they determine what is intended for the use of a child based on what the general consumer believes is for a child. For example, a Blythe doll is a collectible and not a toy for a small child but if you ask the general consumer who does not know what a Blythe doll is they would probably say it’s a toy and therefore it IS a toy and needs to be tested. It does not matter what you label it or if you put up a disclaimer saying that your items are “not intended for anyone 12 and under”. If you sell something that is generally perceived by the public as a childrens item then it is a childrens item regardless of who you say you are marketing to.
February 10th, 2009 has been labeled “National Bankruptcy Day” by many manufactures and retailers in the industry Internationally. While I do agree it is important that measures need to be taken in order to protect children, this law as it stands will only contribute to the downfall of the US economy. I want to make it very clear that shop owners do want to comply with this law but the way the law is currently written there is no chance of survival for many small businesses.
Changes need to be made so please make your voice heard by signing a petition, write to and call your congress person, send a letter to talk show hosts like Oprah, Ellen, Rachel Ray, Martha Stewart, contact your local news stations and follow along at http://nationalbankruptcyday.com It would be a real shame to see all the lovely handmade shops, vintage shops, thrift shops, local retailers and manufactures of children’s products be forced to close their doors come February. Feel free to post any links to sites with info relating to the CPSIA and to re-post this info on your own blog.
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/economicimpactsofCPSIA/index.html
Vote for Change at Change.org:
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/save_handmade_toys_from_the_cpsia
The Handmade Toy Alliance has provided a sample letter and listed contact info for your Congress Person and Senators:
http://www.handmadetoyalliance.org/
National Bankruptcy Day Site:
http://nationalbankruptcyday.com
Write to man who sponsored this bill and send him an item of yours that will be illegal to sell after Feb 9th, 2009 in protest. http://www.etsy.com/forums_thread.php?thread_id=5949146
Bobby L. Rush (D)
Washington Office
2416 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
phone: 202-225-4372
fax: 202-226-0333
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.






















December 22nd, 2008 at 9:56 am
Thanks for publicizing this and for including National Bankruptcy Day! My other site with includes the War Room has up to the minute updates and focused activism. http://tinyurl.com/5fhzbd. My main site is focusing on education and activism for producers of sewn products. There’s tons of solid information there from attorneys and scientists. You won’t find any mythinformation there.
January 4th, 2009 at 4:23 pm
Hopefully a provision will be made for small business owners otherwise this will be devastating.
January 5th, 2009 at 11:56 pm
There is no way that this is going to be enforceable. Do you seriously think that they’ve got the manpower to go out investigating every garage sale or to sit and monitor who’s selling what online?
IF this is true, there’ll be such an uproar about it that something will have to be changed.
January 6th, 2009 at 11:48 am
Yes, this policy may have a impact for children products (including toys, children wear.) I have highlighted some criticals point of CPSIA requirements on my blog, please kindly visit for more information.
http://textilebulletin.blogspot.com/
January 8th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
This is a faulty interpretation of the CPSIA.
Please reveiw the Commission’s advisory from September 12, 2008. There are two issues: what’s banned, and what requires mandatory testing. The Advisory says that current inventory that exceeds the lead limit is banned, but it doesn’t say you need to test it. As for what requires mandatory testing, that’s only stuff manufactured after 2/10/09. It also only applies to manufacturers who release products through commercial distribution channels. It does not apply to the retailer-consumer transaction.
Section 102 (Testing and Certification) applies to manufacturers and importers who release products through commercial distribution channels. It does not apply to retailers and small manufacturers who sell directly to consumers.
Section 216 (Prohibited Acts) does apply to retailers. You can’t sell stuff that exceeds the lead limit or you’re violating FSHA. But there is NO LEGAL REQUIREMENT for you to test your products through an authorized third-party laboratory.
Please review with an attorney who is familiar with regulatory affairs before jumping on this popular bandwagon.
January 8th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
While I voted at change.org and do hope it turns out to be productive I don’t feel it is enough. President Barack Obama actually has a site at http://change.gov/ . There is a section marked Open For Questions. The most popular concerns will be addressed by this team! Right now this issue is NOWHERE near the lead…people need to get over to http://change.gov/ .